Sodom and gemorah archaeological dating Sexweb chat roulette sites
 Although the Bab edh-Dhra has not been confirmed as the definite biblical Sodom, there is very strong evidence linking it to the Sodom described in the infallible Word of God. Conder, Selah Merrill, Henry B Tristram, William M.  This location provides the evidence for scholars to lean towards the Tall el-Hammam as the biblical Sodom, instead of the southern site, Bab edh-Dhra. However, a professor from Albuquerque has followed and found based on the geography and history presented in the Bible a site called Tall el-Hammam, the northern site in question. Collins and many other scholars believe that this site is actually the correct site for biblical Sodom. Supporting this, a majority of biblical scholars locate Bethel, near Beitin, about 12 miles north of Jerusalem. Pub ID=BSBA &Volume=39&Issue=2&Article ID=2&User ID=1037.
He states, “The city wall, enclosing an area of 9-10 acres, was a massive 7m (23 ft) wide and made of stones and mud bricks.  They form their conclusion based on an analysis of the Hebrew text and their understanding of geography. Collins explains that the place that Lot set out to is clearly between Bethel and Ai. “Sodom and Gomorrah: The location of the Cities of the Plain.
 Furthermore, Genesis describes Sodom as “a well watered land like the land of Egypt.
Therefore, the Paleo-botanical studies done on and at the Bab edh-Dhra site reveal that the area has had a rich diversity of crops, meeting the criteria for a well-watered land. “Digging for Sin City, Christians Toil in Jordan Desert; Prof Collins seeks Sodom with Scriptures as Guide and Volunteers as Muscle.
Collins says the “Bible makes it clear that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed during the Middle Bronze Age, the time of Abraham and Lot”.
 This dating is certainly the biggest difference between the two sites in question.
The Southern site for Sodom is commonly referred to as the Bab edh-Dhra and the northern site for Sodom is referred to as the Tall el-Hammam.